TheAncient

quoted for irony it's already been shown mathematically that bandos is more time efficient, assuming even pretty low money/hr (i forgot exact what but it's low)

Please tell me you kept the red phat otherwise you are incredibly stupid. nope, i've given up a blue, red, white, and yellow in my rs career

Registering date really doesn't mean anything if you didn't PK, which is clear from your post as you only represent a skillers point of view(and why wouldn't a pker kill a skiller if they collide?). A pure idiot would be someone skilling in the wilderness not expecting to be attacked(it's not as though revenants ignore skillers, is it?). Pking with free trade was about being skilled, not like it is today. You used to make your own fortune, and pking in expensive gear gave you an advantage, not like nowadays where pking welfare is the way to go and pking in expensive gear means you are disadvantaged. has more to do with combat system than free trade or not regardless, skill still gets you places in safe pvp nowadays. risk is too high in dangerous.

back in the day bank from wayyyyy back when my current bank is still less than this, lol. (i dropped my bank previously) ^ me getting 99 untrimmed hp

pros>verac>tass my bad i'm pretty sure Swc>fire cape if you value time at like 2m an hour, i have to do the calc again idk

POSSIBLY dk's but not really

look for my thread "preliminary analysis of damage soaking" in general disc has a lot of similar information but calculated differently

afaik salamanders aren't affected by boosts, but not sure

BCP>Proselyte for plate verac>tasset for legs\\ if you have turm you have ss, if you have ss you don't need defense

i mean i had a whole conversation that i didn't post, but you'll just have to take my word on that. was more than two people, including some mods.

lol are you calling me a liar? i didn't fabricate that picture. i have no reason to unless i were trolling, which i am not. again, i never said it is definite proof that MMG said anything. it is, however, not impossible and maybe even likely. at this point we do not know if it is a rumor or not.

... and how is any of that "proof"? :unsure: I could just as easily replicate it in my own cc and make the same baseless claims. <_< i never claimed it was proof. <-- i said this repeatedly it's mod mmg's cc

Just to be clear before some noob tries to troll-jack this thread: This theory is perfectly testable. Measure corp magic accuracy now and and measure corp magic accuracy before via YT vids of people in most optimal gear and maxed cb stats to control for those variables. See if the two are likely to be the same or not the same based on statistics.

I support raising hitpoints to 120

if so, div/ely will rise. sigh. let's see if more people can corroborate this claim

the problem here is that it's not as if logdotzip (or anyone, really) can provide evidence AFTER THE FACT. like honestly, you can't really provide further evidence at this point unless you were jamflex. so really it's just a matter of believing his word or not. i think it's possible that mmg did say what logdotzip claims. there's no reason or proof to say that logdot is absolutely wrong.

if FKS didn't exist I would gladly pay 200M+ for arc in some cases i'd even prefer arcane over elysian. a few of the really good brids i know use it over divine when maging 60M~ is its stable price glad to see you bought one. doubt you'll regret it.

grats noob you have like 5x my dg xp by now probably lmao

the point of the picture was to show logdot isn't pulling this out his a

like logdot said, this was a very small incident and yes, the circumstances around it seem pretty shady so i doubt many people would believe it. just to be clear, i am not claiming that the wildy or free trade are likely to come back. i am suggesting that it is possible that mmg did go into that clan chat and talk about it, cause the overwhelming majority of the cc said so when i entered. there were mods there too so i don't think the entire cc is simply pranking.

You can't KO effectively with a CLS. Rapier has KO potential in that it can hit two high hits quickly with time for only one food in between hits. Maul has KO potential in that it hits really high. CLS isn't fast enough to combo well, but isn't as strong as the maul. CLS is not for PvP. There's also really just Sara as far as monsters with sufficient defense to make the CLS distinctly better than the rapier- they're ridiculously close to equal on Bandos. CLS is a little bit better for safe pvp, since most of healing comes from SS in safe pvp and not food Also accuracy is much more important in safe pvp but the difference is hardly noticeable here's an graph showing approximately how good the weapons are in comparison to each other as opponent's defense increases by no means mathematically rigorous but it should give you a good idea. Notice: -- Rapier is a LOT better at low defense -- Rapier is comparable to CLS at high defense (basically the same) -- Maul is better than both rapier and CLS at very high defense Rapier>Maul>CLS The only good reason to get a CLS is that little tail bit at the end: high defense and you can't use maul. Rapier/maul covers everything else

i love how people totally ignored the screenshot I posted not conclusive proof, but it IS evidence.

Keeping an open mind and being naive are two different things. denying the possibility of this is close minded believing this completely is naive there is plenty of gray area in between amitoz your spam posts are getting annoying lol.

keeping an open mind is not a bad thing

Then again, it COMPLETELY depends on what you do. Some people, like me, don't play on slaying long term. I plan to stop after 85, and getting 40k slayer exp with a whip sounds fine to me. Instead, I planned to play castle wars, so I got a cstaff, and rune fights at edge, so I got a maul (arguably, rapier is good at this too, but it's my preference). If at any time in the future I wanted to train slayer/in general, I'd train dungeoneering for a rapier. It's not like once you choose a CLS first, you can NEVER go back for a second or third item. There are many things a rapier can't do, for example, can you mage with it? Can you range with it? One more thing, for those who do intend on only getting 80 dungeoneering, wouldn't it be best to get a well rounded weapon? The cls is very good in pvp, and is probably better than the whip at slaying, and its also good at all those other things you said. So wouldn't it make sense for some people who hate dungeoneering to get the average (but better than other non-dg) weapon for most if not all things? That's just what I think. yes, but only in very extreme cases. Realistically, your claim only applies to accounts whichdo not meler at all. i am confident you made the wrong choice in staff over rapier if you pvp with melee. staff is only more useful than rapier if you simply do not melee at all. rapier is good even if you have a maul. also rapier is proficient at basically all monsters, not just slaying. it is just exceptionally good at slaying. there is nothing remarkable about the cls; it is basically the same as rapier in some cases and much worse in others and no, the idea of getting only a cls is laughable and stupid. reread this whole thread if you disagree. rapier is an all purpose melee weapon. cls and maul are not.