Da_Latios
Members-
Posts
2484 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Da_Latios
-
09-Feb-2011 � Prisoner of Glouphrie and Gnome Graphical Rework
Da_Latios replied to Michael's topic in General Discussion
You're a goddamn badass if you can get angry without swearing. -
anyone else sick of free trade whiners?
Da_Latios replied to Hilramorre's topic in General Discussion
Put aside the fact that even though Jagex basicly admitted that Bots and RWT will always be a problem and that Free Trade would vastly increase these problems... Answer me this..; If Jagex claims they can manage Bots and RWT much better, wouldn't it have been much wiser to test those systems before implementing Free Trade? Don't you think it's rather stupid that they dove in face first with all this, before even testng if the water is really deep enough? Jagex works in mysterious ways. -
I'm sorry you feel the need to ignore my comments. If you want to go ahead and think these photos are good, there's nothing stopping you. I didn't want to comment because I was afraid I'd hurt your feelings. Clearly, I've managed to do just that. I wish I could have been more positive. I really do. But when boring snapshots of random uninteresting objects which look like they were taken with a cellphone or a point-and-shoot on full auto are being passed off as "good", it really irritates me.
-
The way you've described the conditions, I wouldn't call it an intervention. However there is so much more questions as to how everything came to be in your scenario (like the billion planets, the life that occurred that we don't discuss how it occurred) that it makes the "absurd" higher power much more probable and much less absurd. If you're curious to how stars and planets come to exist, pick up an astronomy or astrophysics textbook. He should just watch a couple of episodes of Cosmos. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShJwq3aPLMk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxQR6gdd1P0
-
What is this? I don't even... I'm sorry, but they're terrible. I certainly don't feel "wow"ed when looking at the first image. It may have looked good in real life, but this is just plain boring. It's tilted, it's just... brown, there's nothing to look at. The point of focus isn't interesting at all. These all "feel" yuck. Okay. The second one. Firstly, motion blur. Not a good thing. Secondly, why did you even take the photo? I can almost smell the foot odour from here. It's dark, it's brown, it's boring, there's nothing interesting about this photo. There's nothing to focus on, and it just looks MESSY. Third one, basically the same. This is just depressing. It's two shoes, at an awkward angle, once again dark, blurred and uninteresting. The only way you could have improved these photos would have been to not have taken them at all. The subjects are uninteresting, and that's one of the most basic things you need to look out for: an interesting subject. It doesn't look like you were going for a "lighting effect" at all. These look like cellphone pictures in dim house lighting. There very well may have been a wonderful eerie glow around whatever you were trying to photograph in real life, but that definitely can't be seen in the photos.
-
When the hell is valentines? And why is it so early in the year? I just started a film & visual effects course and don't even know anyone yet.
-
Now What? Bless his grave or get a free 30+m? <FREE TRADE UPDATE>
Da_Latios replied to jjjon123's topic in General Discussion
You can get back to bandos gwd in under 6 minutes. It's always been safe. With a 6-minute gravestone? You do realise that your items disappear when you gravestone runs out of time, right? Yes. You do realise it was possible to get back and get your items, right? Say you made it back in 5 mins 40 secs. You now have 20 seconds to get everything. You might miss something. -
Now What? Bless his grave or get a free 30+m? <FREE TRADE UPDATE>
Da_Latios replied to jjjon123's topic in General Discussion
You can get back to bandos gwd in under 6 minutes. It's always been safe. With a 6-minute gravestone? You do realise that your items disappear when you gravestone runs out of time, right? (I'm talking about the old system) -
Now What? Bless his grave or get a free 30+m? <FREE TRADE UPDATE>
Da_Latios replied to jjjon123's topic in General Discussion
I just ran a test - from my spawn point, with no items equipped or in my inventory, I managed to make it INTO the Bandos boss room in 7 minutes and 31 seconds (of course counting banking time etc). This included god items for Bandos, Zamorak and Saradomin, a weapon, a pack yak full of monkfish, and a prayer potion. Bandos soloing is now almost completely safe :D -
I wouldn't do anything different. I'm totally cool with how my life is.
-
Now What? Bless his grave or get a free 30+m? <FREE TRADE UPDATE>
Da_Latios replied to jjjon123's topic in General Discussion
Honestly, I love my new 15 minute grave timer. I went ahead and blessed about 3 collapsing default gravestones since yesterday. Looters got angry. -
Pretty sure you're not going to get a virus just from opening the link. I did it to see where it redirected to. Anyway, it was pretty easy to tell it was a fake because my registered e-mail with Jagex is a different address to the one they sent it to.
-
Here's what caught my eye.
-
It's very easy to get past safing. With chaotic weapons, and claws, it's very easy to deal more damage than the person can heal. PKing is about knocking the other person out before he has a chance to eat his food or run away. It's not about making them use up all their food.
-
Once a Virgo, always a Virgo. September 20 is my birthday, so mine doesn't change.
-
Or not being allowed to yak bank if you're skulled. I think that'd be a fair compromise. This seems reasonable.
-
If we're going by definitions, yes. Admitting ignorance when you do not know if something is or isn't is probably the best thing to do. When you think something to be true, you believe it. When you think something to be untrue, you don't believe it. When you think something to be bit over your head at the moment and you wish to reserve judgment until further evidence on either side is presented, you don't know. You haven't decided whether to believe it or not yet. Now can you answer my question: Why say you don't believe him if there is a slight part of you that does? Do you believe I can fly? Because I assure you, if someone told me they can fly, a small part of me would believe them too. However, in no way would I seriously consider that small part of me that believes them. I would dismiss it as a ridiculous belief, just like how I dismiss a belief in a supernatural deity.
-
That conclusion hasn't been drawn from the video itself, but from various reports(Twitter, AP etc). But you can clearly see that the military are shielding the protesters, which I would classify as being on their side. This is probably a peacekeeping tactic to minimise conflict.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibxVoGTeQ4w Looks like the Egyptian army has sided with he protesters.
-
This happens to me all the time, and I hate it. lol Then don't [bleep]ing do it. Jesus Christ.
-
Posted on page 2 of this thread. <_<
-
Not true. Pluto existed long before humans discovered it. That's true, but it's absurd to believe in a god until evidence is presented, just as it would have been absurd to believe there was a ninth planet until any evidence was presented. As another example, even if the world ended in 2012, all those who believed that it would end in 2012 would still be lunatics, as there was no evidence to suggest that any such event would occur. It would still have been an absurd belief to hold.
-
http://twitter.com/evanchill/status/31636096068620288 Al Jazeera's getting kicked out of Egypt, but CNN is staying. Why? Because CNN are morons and aren't a real threat to Mubarak.
-
They are equal to the next. You can not prove that human logic is true. Therefor any of our thoughts can basically be said to be false. Yes, even that one ;) ... Well then you must disregard you entire argument, as it can't ever be used, even as an argument for the existence of a god.
-
Of course. Because that's using your logic to think about him being beyond logic. Some eastern mystics say "Be still and know", and by that they mean be still physically and mentally. There is no effort, or thinking required to "know" god. But this is not referencing to knowing god as a separate entity or with any characteristics, because god is beyond logic. That is an inconsistent statement. If the deity is beyond logic, then he is illogical. Also, since he is no longer bound by the realms of logic, one would have to accept every supernatural claim as equally likely as the next. Also, if God is beyond the realm of logic, then how can one make the claim of his existence? Without logic the claim would have to be completely made up. Also, if God created the universe, then we should be able to test parts of the universe to find his existence within reality--which is bound to logic and science. Surely can seem "illogical". God doesn't have to be logical though. I say accept what you feel is true. I don't have to make the claim of his existence. And how can you test for something's "existence" if it is the essence of everything? You will never find scientific evidence because god is not some type of force or shape. It is beyond it. There is really nothing to find. Again, all of this can easily be "false". For I can not prove that any type of human logic and therefore the "facts" that come of it are true. Come on, you're being ridiculous. I could make any claim and use your arguments. I own a pen that keeps tigers away. Oh, you want to see this pen? Sorry, can't do that. You want proof that this pen keeps tigers away? ... Do you see any tigers? How does it work? Oh, I can't explain that to you. The pen is beyond your logic. This pen draws from the essence of EVERYTHING. How can you test for its power's existence if it is the essence of everything? You will never find scientific evidence because the power that binds this pen is not some type of force or shape. It is beyond it. There is really nothing to find. It's absolutely ridiculous, [developmentally delayed]ed and down-right stupid to believe in a god without ANY evidence, let alone a specific god(for example, the Judeo-Christian god) if you've thought it through. Using your arguments, like sephiroth said, one would have to accept every supernatural claim as equally likely as the next.
