Good thing you guys did'nt tell us who the editor is. That secret should be kept. By the way nice article :thumbsup:

 

 

 

You didn't actually think we would, did you???? :wink:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I thought this was supposed to be a friendly community- and the mods were to help us, not to laugh at us Sad ... anyway do you think that "Only about you ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ã¢ââ¬Ãâ slacker!" was a reference to S1acker, the player, instead of an insult?

 

 

 

Aw come on, relax a little! That comment has nothing to do with the player S1acker, and everything to do with one character in the story calling another character lazy. Why do you read so much into one little statement that was supposed to be funny?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's funny that you highlight them two particular words. Swap them around and read this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That comment has everything to do with the player S1acker, and nothing to do with one character in the story calling another character lazy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have solved your code! It's Slacker! :D

Now, are they telling the truth with all these clues, bluffing, double bluffing or even being really sneaky and just bluffing in the hope that we'll think that they're double bluffing? hmmm...

 

 

 

Yes.

Haha, that was great. :)

It's funny that you highlight them two particular words. Swap them around and read this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That comment has everything to do with the player S1acker, and nothing to do with one character in the story calling another character lazy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have solved your code! It's Slacker! :D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#-o :roll:

I don't really care who The Editor is, the only thing I know is that they're all excellent writers :)

Nice article! But I'm still wondering who the Editor is...

I wish I found 1k burnt monkfish on the ground whenevr I attanded a sinister meeting. You must tell me your secret...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The editor(s?), whoever (s)he/they is/are, do(es) his/her/their job well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hmm, all one of them does is grow herbs and make potions eh? I have a suspect. And just to antagonize all of you, I'm not telling you who it is. :P

whoever the hell made the comment about rolling stones, queen and pink floyd should be shot. many MANY times. pink floyd are blatently better than the other two based on record sales alone.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

also, wtf? so much misinformation in there it's confusing beyond all natural reason.

...so much misinformation in there it's confusing beyond all natural reason.

 

 

 

Misinformation or Information? That is the question.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The answer is still yes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To that point ... Reason does not always come naturally.

Nice article.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sadly, all the arguing and discussion has me dizzy. :roll: :shock: -.-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

But I finally figured it out. It all fits now. Especially with the "Fiction" comment. Kiara_Kat IS The Editor. There is no longer a question about this in my mind. What other female or male could insult Kiara_Kat but herself? No one, at least from what I can tell, not like that anyway. And the merge on speaking styles and what-not? A perfect giveaway.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I hate to say it, Kiara_Kat, but you finally blew your cover. YOU'RE CAUGHT... 8-)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'Nuff said. I'll be watching for replies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~Mr. D. V. Devnull

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Late Edit: I personally think I'm nuts after coming back like 2 minutes later and reading my own typing.]

Aw, i wanted that postcard to be a tribute to Pink Floyd, but one of you likes them! Thats good enough. I don't know which one but i will find out which crewbies or admins like Floyd and i will figure them out. I was convinced your little 'slacker' thing may have refered to S1acker but you bumped that theory on the head. We must expose the editor!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also it was a great article, keep ones like this up they entertain the majority of the readers who are active members of the forums. This reminds me of a Noir film, lots of twists and turns, hiding in dark places and of course venician blinds :3>

Unfortunately, I'm more fond of the original kind of articles and didn't find this one too pleasing. Or maybe it's because I'm in a very sad mood right now... I don't know, but I'd just like to see more interesting ones like we've been seeing before. None the less, it was a pretty good article. =D>

I loved this article!! Really I think it's one of the best, it's the first article not from Duke Freedom, which I loved this much :3> =D> .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(BTW I read that topic some time ago. It made me laugh, how they would react after they came to the conclusion there's more then 1 editor :lol: )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, are they telling the truth with all these clues, bluffing, double bluffing or even being really sneaky and just bluffing in the hope that we'll think that they're double bluffing? hmmm...

 

 

 

Yes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One of the most contructive post by a mod ever :roll:

I don't get it. That whole thing was just to say that the editor is more then one person? I sort of assumed that from the beginning but why is there identity a secret? i dont see a reason for it :x

I don't get it. That whole thing was just to say that the editor is more then one person? I sort of assumed that from the beginning but why is there identity a secret? i dont see a reason for it :x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I like the lil mysterious about it now, keeps it fun. And to be honest, what does it really matter. It's just a way to have another nice discussion here on the forums :D.

I still can't figure out who the editor is from that article lol.

Remember the removed article "Biased Banning Raises Brows"? I don't think it would be in The Editor's best interests for Jagex to find out who did it. They were even threatening legal action against tipit, and presumably weren't going to thank The Editor for it.

That was ok. I really don't care though. It seems ironic that a whole edition would be used to alude to the identity(s) of the writer(s).

 

 

 

I have to admit, I was kinda bored with it, but if you really care then the article is quite rivetting.(I don't)

Personally, my money is on the person who bigged it up all week... Kiara Kat.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

think about it, they all call each other nooby, and who's the only person with any moderator/admin role with nooby stats (as far as I know anyway)... except I suspect Kiara almost certainly plays on a seperate account. #-o

Woot, great article here. You guys are just too confusing for me but I do believe that this article gave away the identity of the editor(s). Come on tip.it! Just re-read it and you might be able to point out things that might go to some people. Wall Street Journal....1000 burnt monkfish.....Herbalore.....come on people, those should be sticking out to you!

 

 

 

 

Aw come on, relax a little! That comment has nothing to do with the player S1acker, and everything to do with one character in the story calling another character lazy. Why do you read so much into one little statement that was supposed to be funny?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's funny that you highlight them two particular words. Swap them around and read this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That comment has everything to do with the player S1acker, and nothing to do with one character in the story calling another character lazy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have solved your code! It's Slacker! :D

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

whahahahahhahaha XD thats a good one :P

Nice article. I can respond in only one way...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Go Queen. \

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pink Floyd? :-k

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loser.

I thought it was an ok article. Not much revealed there, understandably.

Oh number 2, how you make me laugh...

 

 

 

OR SHOULD I SAY SLIMFAR!!!! TIP.IT'S RESIDENT HERBALIST!!! :-w

1000 monkfish, my first guess was zoidnerd