May 12, 200719 yr Maybe they should make a separate F2P Highscore and P2P Highscore. :-k ~Angat14~ I thought about that, too.. but not all people who have member stats are -still- members. it is a good suggestion though. I think it would also condone more criticism because it would make members seem more seperated from F2Pers. yeah I`m kind of annoyed with how many people are raising stats. my atk is 61 and wasn`t ranked because I was 300 some odd xp off and it makes it look like my character sucks.. considering that my stat of only 55 def is listed. (it being 79 combat) They should make top 1.5m or 2m because there are blatantly way more than that many accounts made especially with all of the autoers now.
May 12, 200719 yr Don't make the hi-scores based on total xp. Example: You can get easily get 1.5M xp a day by doing certain rather easy member skills like fletching/thieving/herblore. Just look at this: http://rsstats.nl/home.php?page=rise It's site where you can monitor the xp/ranks gained by different players from day to day. - Back to casual f2p scaping due to limited time (university and girlfriend ) -
May 12, 200719 yr 1 million members 1 million in highscores never though about that, yes I think they should add another 500k places or something Computers will never be above humans because we made them.That's what monkeys used to say about us.
May 12, 200719 yr They should have a little sort button for the hiscores, you can arrange it by experience, alter between F2P/P2P or total level. I don't think it would be that hard to create, but I suppose some issues could be complicated.
May 12, 200719 yr Its freaking me out :ohnoes: All my stats are still in there so I'm happy. I think that with all these members it might lead to top 1,500,500 or even a totally seperate F2P and P2P highscores I'm hoping they do create at last an option to view members sepratly, so that I can see how I compare to the rest of F2P.
May 12, 200719 yr A seperate highscore option would solve this in a way... 99 Fletch~~99 WC~~79/81 Fishing87/94 Magic~~84 RangeEtha! Saradomin Forever~CWCB: 107 Total: 1788+ON BREAK
May 12, 200719 yr yeah I know there are members with 100 more total levels then me, but I have double the xp... it should really rank based on xp that would help a lot. Other fixes could be make it up to 2 million, make sepertate as well as combained high scores for member and f2p. don't even get me started on the autoers stealing high score places...
May 12, 200719 yr i rememebr getting intot he top 500k then a week later it was updated to 1million i was so upset that my ahrd work was a waste
May 12, 200719 yr For most other levels, Non-Members have the same change to get into the highscores as Members, although it can take some longer (Sharks vs. Lobsters for example).lobsters are much faster for xp... anyway, thats true, id say only about 5% of people on the high scores, Maybe jagex should make a separate, f2p high scores(while keeping the current one intact)? or just raise the current one to 2m? Btw, I remember the day they showed top 250,000 :) Nov 21st, 2003: We are pleased to announce that our new Hiscores system is now running, showing the top 250,000 players in each skill! You can still find the Hiscores tables from the same link on our main page, and although they may look the same, they are updating much more frequently. The Jagex Web Dev Team Lastfm
May 12, 200719 yr yah i remember when i was f2p and i got into the highscores with 624 total..now the stats i had when i left f2p and went members 805 total would barely be in the highscores.
May 12, 200719 yr just a picture to let you see the difference between f2p players and members in the highscores if they split the higscores into f2p / p2p / both then free players will also see a nice rank next to their names + then they also see the amount of xp to get a higher rank into top f2p rsname: lord rex.december 2011: ranked 107th best f2p playermarch 2012 became member.
May 12, 200719 yr Its freaking me out :ohnoes: All my stats are still in there so I'm happy. I think that with all these members it might lead to top 1,500,500 or even a totally seperate F2P and P2P highscores I actually think separate F2P and P2P highscores is a really good idea. Now, dealing with F2P accounts that used to be P2P could be tricky (maybe once you're P2P, you stay on those highscores), but it would certainly level the playing field for pure f2p players. To be honest, I think being in the top 12 f2p players is just as big or maybe even a bigger accomplishment than being in the top 12 p2p players (a.k.a. maxed out), simply because there are so many less options for training. Combat has to be trained with rune scimmy instead of whip, high alch options are extremely limited, ranged is capped at maple bows and green dragonhide, runecrafting is left with no money making potential and slower exp, etc. Legends quest completed at lvl 47 on X Legendre X#3056 to 99 firemaking, achieved on July 4th, 2007.Tied for #1854 to 99 farming, achieved on September 3rd, 2008.
May 12, 200719 yr I think they should split the hiscores into f2p and p2p. Or else have two separate hiscores, one where you are ranked based on your total, using xp to break ties (like the current one), and one where your rank is based on your xp, using level to break ties.
May 12, 200719 yr I think that is a great idea to seperate them, but also autoers are definetly taking over the hiscores. My 60 woodcutting isn't even in there while my like 34 runecrafting is, and evn though so many are getting banned members and autoers are taking over the hiscores. :ohnoes:
May 12, 200719 yr Buy, WHY would Jagex want to make seperate hi scores? More members on hi scores, the more people become memver to get on the hi scores. Yeah, just something I thought of, anyone reckon this is true? Doomy edit: I like sheep
May 13, 200719 yr Maybe it's just me, but I think free players are still able to keep up with members in most non-combat skills, while the combat skill high scores are more and more members-only. Is Pest Control the reason?
May 13, 200719 yr Author People won't become member to se themself in the Highscores :roll: If people become a member, it's for the amount of quests and other skills, not to see themself on the highscores. Highscores where you can choose to rank might be a good idea, like you can rank your worlds. Rank: - Members - Non-Members - Experience "A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do"[Currently playing: K1ll L1f3]
May 13, 200719 yr The best solution would be to make overall ranking based on total exp, not total level. Or to at least let us sort the high scores by total exp. I mean, 99 in one skill is the same exp roughly as getting level 73 in 14 skills. So you get 99 points toward your total ranking versus 992 points toward your overall ranking for the same amount of experience. That would help f2p players get a better idea of where they stand, since it takes fairly high levels in all skills in order to even break onto the high scores. For an f2p skiller, it's damn near impossible. Check out this cool browser gladiator game!
May 13, 200719 yr I think the number should be lower not higher, before you know it creating an account will get you in the high score list -.-
May 13, 200719 yr I think the number should be lower not higher, before you know it creating an account will get you in the high score list -.-Agreed. Runescape is simply too lenient for highscores where it is supposed to be for the better players out there. Yet like getting 30 rc instantly gets you into highscore. Now ask yourself, how long did getting 30 rc take you and it is not hard. Making the highscore too easy for entry defeats the purpose of its existance. I'll suggest it being decreased to top 500k/250k again :boohoo: Strangely with WotLK so near, I wished I could delay it a bit to push through that last TBC content in MH/BT :'(.
May 13, 200719 yr Author I can see what you mean by saying the Highscores need to be something exclusive. But by making the highscores Top-250,000 they will be Members-only. Maybe 100 Non-Members who are in there. And aren't the Highscores just here to check on our stats? "A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do"[Currently playing: K1ll L1f3]
May 13, 200719 yr I can see what you mean by saying the Highscores need to be something exclusive. But by making the highscores Top-250,000 they will be Members-only. Maybe 100 Non-Members who are in there. That only applies to total lvl being unfair due to the difference between amount of skills both sides have. However, for other skills like cooking, wc, fishing, it won't look like it's only for members. And aren't the Highscores just here to check on our stats?It's not hard to login to check your stats anyway :| Strangely with WotLK so near, I wished I could delay it a bit to push through that last TBC content in MH/BT :'(.
May 13, 200719 yr Seperate highscores wouldn't work. what about the players that were members before and became f2p, or plyers that switch between mems and f2p? simple ... if at any time you were a member you would be in the members hi scores since you had a chance to raise your p2p skills and you would stay on the non members hi scores as long as you stayed f2p .signature your as this use backwards this read to enough smart were you If
May 13, 200719 yr Author And aren't the Highscores just here to check on our stats?It's not hard to login to check your stats anyway :| I mean for others to see your stats. "A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do"[Currently playing: K1ll L1f3]
Create an account or sign in to comment