Jump to content

Do jagex purposely leave AUTO'S IN F2P?


ewan

Recommended Posts

i think they pay more attention to member worlds, because they want to keep the paying people happy...

 

I don't think they do it to encourage f2pers to get members, they just pay less attention to f2p worlds

 

 

 

pretty much agreed, because people in members actually pay for the game, and they want paying customers to be happy, so they'd recieve money.

 

 

 

And they do ban alot of autoers in f2p aswell, you just cant tell it so easily, as it doesn't cost a thing to make new account in f2p

[/url]">i_had_a_deal.png
[4Th in Finland to achieve 99 mining. 3Rd of June 2007]


Pixels make me horny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they certainly pay more attention to banning autoers in members, to keep their paying customers happy, but that doesn't mean they ignore F2P. They ban thousands of autoers in F2P every month but the problem is that it's easy just to create a mass of new accounts and auto them back up to the levels they need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They want to deal with paying customers first. Thats simple.

 

If F2p see how non macro memebers is they might go memebers.

 

Gotta have more memeber you know :)

Click for My Blog

Runescapew44.png

b3e1cfada6.png

670th to 99 Smithing July 21st, 07 |743rd to 99 Mining November 29th, 07 | 649th to 99 Runecrafting May 18th, 08 | 29,050th to 99 Defence October 20th, 08 | 20,700th to 99 Magic November 8, 08 | 47,938th to 99 Attack December 19, 08 | 37,829th to 99 Hitpoints December 24, 08 | 68,604th to 99 Strength February 4, 09 | 27,983rd to 99 Range February 9, 09 | 9,725th to 99 Prayer June 8, 09 | 6,620th to 99 Slayer December, 12 09 | 4,075th to 99 Summoning December, 28 09 | 3,551th to 99 Herblore February 24, 10 | 3,192th to 99 Dungeoneering November 11, 10 | 146,600th to 99 Cooking December 29th, 10 | 11,333rd to 99 Construction June 7th, 11 | 16,648th to 99 Farming August 1st, 11 | 19,993th to 99 Crafting August 2nd, 11 | 89,739th to 99 Woodcutting Janurary 1st, 12 | 55,424th to 99 Fishing May 9th, 12| 60,648th to 99 Firemaking May 12th, 12 | 16666th to 99 Agility May 17th, 2012 | 24476th to 99 Hunter June 1st, 2012 | 57,881st to 99 Fletching June 1st, 2012 | All 99s June 1st, 2012 | 3183th to 120 Dungeoneering July 24th, 2012 | 2341st to 2496 Total level July 24th, 2012 | Completionist Cape July 24th, 2012

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking about autoers, I have been waiting ever since the release of the pure/normal essence for a similar type of solution with yew logs. In that, logs cut in F2P can only be burned and logs in P2P can either be burned or Fletched. It was just an idea, and I wonder if they will ever do it.

sig3gk6.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ive timed myself, it takes under 5 mins to make a new account from scratch.

 

 

 

members requires money which means they are probably even frauding their members or buying members illegally, why should jagex concentrate on f2p first, why do topics like these even exist.

Bbc_3.gif

4000000657th to 99 cookin

555555406th to 99 flethcin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, it amuses me HOW MANY PEOPLE missed the point COMPLETELY. I am not saying that they should SEE TO FREE PLAYER WORLDS FIRST, rather that they may leaving players here to make people get membership. If YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND THAT then DON'T POST.

I AM SURELY GOING TO WIN THE AWARD OF THE MOST LOVED TIP.IT'ER EVER, SURELY?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If F2p see how non macro memebers is they might go memebers.

 

 

 

You're kidding right? Flax fields--green dragons-Fishing guild

 

I could go on...

POG3.jpg

Pretty much what Dragon said.

Thread terminated.

I guess that means I'm the thread Terminator?

 

No Tip.Iters were harmed in the making of this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, it amuses me HOW MANY PEOPLE missed the point COMPLETELY. I am not saying that they should SEE TO FREE PLAYER WORLDS FIRST, rather that they may leaving players here to make people get membership. If YOU CAN'T COMPREHEND THAT then DON'T POST.

 

 

 

so you're saying they don't ban macroers on f2p on purpose.. basically making macroing legal on f2p? if that was the case then everyone would have a f2p accoun constantly autoing to harvest yews etc. No.. jagex doesnt want autoers anywhere: f2p or p2p but their priorities are with p2p. when p2p autoing is at a more managable level i'm sure they will make a big crackdown on the f2p macros.

red-mask-sig.gif?t=1238621802

MSSW4Banner.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If F2p see how non macro memebers is they might go memebers.

 

 

 

 

Remind me how your average non-member is meant to see member worlds?

Schmuall.png

give F2P a penny and they want a dime; give P2P a quarter, they want 100,000 dollars, your car, house, boat, social security number, credit card numbers, drivers license, clothes on your back and everything you ever owned or interacted with ever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

call me crazy but doesnt this theory say the opposite about jagex? you seem to think they only care about making money yet they mass ban the autoers on member servers...

 

 

 

You just contradicted yourself, if they ban macroers in members, the will keep the players that pay. Then they don't lose them because of the macroing problem, then the f2pers get members so they don't have as much autoers and such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are definitely banning autoers in F2P a lot. I have actually walked past the Yew trees south of Falador recently and seen zero people cutting them. However, as has been said, it is too easy to make new ones. And because of that there will always be more on the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, way easier to make a f2p account. I think jagex is doing the best they can getting rid of them. They are expected to update once a week, and they've been sticking close to that and still got rid of a fair amont of autoers. They will always come back and in 2 months im sure there will be posts about how they ruin the game, but jagex is doing what they can to get rid of them and improve rs

swordwarior.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

call me crazy but doesnt this theory say the opposite about jagex? you seem to think they only care about making money yet they mass ban the autoers on member servers...

 

 

 

You just contradicted yourself, if they ban macroers in members, the will keep the players that pay. Then they don't lose them because of the macroing problem, then the f2pers get members so they don't have as much autoers and such.

 

 

 

winner of the genius award right here

 

 

 

guess what!! autoers have to pay the $5 a month too!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

call me crazy but doesnt this theory say the opposite about jagex? you seem to think they only care about making money yet they mass ban the autoers on member servers...

 

 

 

You just contradicted yourself, if they ban macroers in members, the will keep the players that pay. Then they don't lose them because of the macroing problem, then the f2pers get members so they don't have as much autoers and such.

 

 

 

winner of the genius award right here

 

 

 

guess what!! autoers have to pay the $5 a month too!!!

 

 

 

 

 

10k autoing members a month means they lose 50k a month... or make 50k a month

 

 

 

but if autoers get banned, then sign up again the next week and are banned that week and its like that for the month technically jagex could make $5 a week, instead of $5 a month on autoers.

 

 

 

if that was the cause, they could double their monthly profits in turn using that to rid the game better of autoers fully. that is to say, like for a year 10k people(autoers) had that problem it could go like this 10k people, say they subscribe 3 times a month for $5 thats ($15*10,000)=(150k*12months)=$1,800,000 per year. ontop of the millionish members.

 

 

 

1.8mil a year in real $ could seriously fund jagex into being lazy carefree well to do people, like i assume they ARE somewhat already, but to an even greater state of carelessness. or they could use it to hire people to properly make better updates faster after they rid them selves of the autoers, or in turn keep these autoers making this funding for employees to grow even greater.

 

 

 

if my math was off, feel free to let me know... i may have [bleep]ed it up a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.