Anesthesia

If you use a more descriptive title in the future you might be able to expect more help. Try going to start > run Then type: %SystemRoot%\System32\mspaint[Caution: ExecutableFile]

And uber accurate too, by the looks of things.

I don't look at the keyboard and I do type the BBCode myself. However, I do have to align myself with the keyboard when I first sit down, otherwise I'll end up being one key off to the side. It feels good when you have not been looking at either the keyboard or the screen and you can still tell when you've made a mistake.

What do you mean "your internet system is hooked up on your windows computer"? If you have a wireless router connecting you to the internet then you can use the connection on your mac.

Eating zombies gives you dysentery. You should know that.

Isn't one zombie-killing thread enough? Anyway, I'd choose "Save the Zombies".

You'd get pretty close to death, if not dieing altogether. You'd struggle, since CO is gaseous at room temperature.

I'm not well versed in this subject, but you could start here: http://www.doom9.org/ Particularly the guides section.

http://www.kent-hovind.com/articles/semite.htm If he is a dork, why are you so keen on sticking up for him?

How about- We've had a 10^100 topics on that.

kelem_ryu, we're not the ones claiming something works without evidence of it. Also, we're not the ones who believe in magic. I still can't get over that one.

Wow, really? You were implying that it is okay to hurt them because they won't remember it. Given that was the reason you gave for it being okay to hurt them, I compared it to a human who doesn't have a long term memory.

You are female. You are 5'7". They generally not subject to interpretation. They are quantitative, not qualitative. Qualitative statements are subject to interpretation and that is why self-reporting (in whatever guise) is not reliable evidence. Self reporting can refer to others too - just someone other than the experimenter.

True, many treatments were first developed on animals.

It's not that we think it can - it simply can. It's not that we think it can - it simply can. I am honestly astonished that you still don't get it.

If they have no long term memory then how would they be grateful? How would they know what had happened to them (that is, aside from the gaping hole in their face). By your rationale it would be just fine to beat up people with anterograde amnesia, because they wouldn't remember it afterwards.

Sorry to hear that. Will you still be providing relationship counselling?

I have one called headscarfy.

For some people, being judged as being part of a certain group gives them acceptance that they can't find elsewhere.

The garage glitch is a pretty old thing, I remember using it in GTA3. That's because it is computationally expensive to clear the screen after every frame drawn. Computer games generally don't bother clearing the screen since new things will always been drawn over it in the next frame. However, it can be noticed when you go outside of the area you're expected to be in, such as below the level, or outside using noclip on whatever game it is. This is because the entire scene isn't being covered by newly drawn material each frame.

It doesn't work like that though, assassin_696. That argument doesn't work when the people set out to catch them then release them - since it would have been better had they just not caught them in the first place.

Why would you need to put water in the bucket? The fish would be dead.

Bucket.

I am surprised you still don't understand after the number of times I have repeated myself. You did interpret it when you read it. I already explained how they can be. They can be told that astrology works. It is even just implied that it works by their being presented with a horoscope to read. Yes it does, if you can't explain why horoscopes aren't accurate for every single person in the world then it is no better than rolling a dice to decide their personalities. No, I said that to you it might as well be magic. You can't explain how it is happening so for all you know it is magic. Anyway, have you come to a decision on who is right about when birth is? You say when you exit the womb (an event which lasts more than several seconds - you still haven't responded to that) yet kelem_ryu says it is when you take the first breath - who is right?

My point is that you can't. Therefore it is no more credible than magic. You do believe in astrology. You cited your horoscope as being accurate. Thus, your 'proof' is flawed. People are told that astrology works - that can give bias to their interpretation of that first reading. You are hardly in a position to tell me what will and will not stand, when you are unable to explain how astrology works, other than it being magic. If you know that it isn't biased then you accept that almost anyone can make any reading apply to them through interpretation.