SomeWelshGuy Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Yay! At least I can give my friends something for their Birthdays :P Retired Tip.It Crew Mapper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordanweb Posted December 17, 2007 Author Share Posted December 17, 2007 just give jagex sometime and they improve pking. Why improve it when they could just bring back the old system with limitations that would kill RWT but leave everything in that the rest of us liked about it? Because the old system sucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordendravid Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 :D I just realized lending means we can lend our precious Holiday Items to friends to wear, without fear that they may run away with them. I'll laugh if they die....wearing the rare. Hopefully the rare is returned or -.- ^ Wouldn't work.. If any borrowed item was returned to the owner upon death then all you'd need to do is borrow the items you wanted to use in (for example) Bounty Hunter and hey presto no risk of losing items.. I'm not sure how they'll implement it, but it's obvious that a lot of thought needs to go into it to prevent people taking advantage of something like the above, but also to protect the lender from losing their stuff. Personally, I'm not sure that this idea will work too well. Although there are some easy solutions - for example with Bounty Hunter "you may not enter this area as the items you are holding are borrowed" but there are plenty of other places in the game where it is possible to die, and would be advantageous if you didn't lose any of the items you're holding when you do. Additionally, if there was no risk in lending out items, consider the number of people that will turn into 'borrowing noobs' the old "free stoof plox" will turn into "borrow ur phat plox" overnight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baalboy5 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 No complants, but lets see the rants forums? Don't you know the first rule of MMO's? Anyone higher level than you has no life, and anyone lower than you is a noob. People in OT eat glass when they are bored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x_bow80 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 I laugh at the people who quit and dumped their stuff. Then read this and wish they hadn't :lol: Sounds really good though. 99 Pics - Range, Defence, HP, Attack, Magic, Strength, Cooking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qeltar Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 The fact that they nuked the old wildy and hand over some half-assed namesakes in its place just shows how little thought they put into this update. Actually, it supports the contention that they did this because they felt they had to. Qeltar, aka Charles KozierokWebmaster, RuneScoop - Premium RuneScape Information for Expert Players -- Now Free!Featuring the Ultimate Guide to Dungeoneering -- everything you need to know to get the most of the new skill! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBC3 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 just give jagex sometime and they improve pking. Why improve it when they could just bring back the old system with limitations that would kill RWT but leave everything in that the rest of us liked about it? and what would that be? how about using the suggestions forum on the rsof instead of being here and complaining. 4000000657th to 99 cookin555555406th to 99 flethcin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBC3 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 just give jagex sometime and they improve pking. Why improve it when they could just bring back the old system with limitations that would kill RWT but leave everything in that the rest of us liked about it? Because the old system sucked. -1 i disagree parody of your sig since most of the times on these forums you make no sense. 4000000657th to 99 cookin555555406th to 99 flethcin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naruto_1001 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 :D I just realized lending means we can lend our precious Holiday Items to friends to wear, without fear that they may run away with them. I'll laugh if they die....wearing the rare. Hopefully the rare is returned or -.- ^ Wouldn't work.. If any borrowed item was returned to the owner upon death then all you'd need to do is borrow the items you wanted to use in (for example) Bounty Hunter and hey presto no risk of losing items.. I'm not sure how they'll implement it, but it's obvious that a lot of thought needs to go into it to prevent people taking advantage of something like the above, but also to protect the lender from losing their stuff. Personally, I'm not sure that this idea will work too well. Although there are some easy solutions - for example with Bounty Hunter "you may not enter this area as the items you are holding are borrowed" but there are plenty of other places in the game where it is possible to die, and would be advantageous if you didn't lose any of the items you're holding when you do. Additionally, if there was no risk in lending out items, consider the number of people that will turn into 'borrowing noobs' the old "free stoof plox" will turn into "borrow ur phat plox" overnight! I was reading this topic till the end hoping nobody said this before I would, but well you did :D I wanted to say the same and I totally agree with you. A F2Per would lend his Full Rune to his friend and then his friend is going to kill some giant spiders, when he dies he go get prayer in Lumbridge where his friend will stand with the full rune and he can go die again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sy_Accursed Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Since pretty much everyone who goes to sara godwars is in a team and soon with lootshare on. How will those hilts ever get in the economy again? :? Since what I am thinking is that it will be deleted from runescape, only to be replaced by gp. Meh, just have to wait I guess. No interrest in coming back for a 1v1 arena wich might come as late as June. They said they were thinking a way that it goes onto the bGE but sellprice is automagically split between the team. That means u all get gp stead of item, but hilts still filter into circulation Operation Gold Sparkles :: Chompy Kills :: Full Profound :: Champions :: Barbarian Notes :: Champions Tackle Box :: MA RewardsDragonkin Journals :: Ports Stories :: Elder Chronicles :: Boss Slayer :: Penance King :: Kal'gerion Titles :: Gold Statue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonlordjl Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 30k is still chump change. 100k or hell, even 300k, would be far more fair and would still not allow RWTs to profit. Most trades vary between 50-100k per trade. No one using a disposable account will spend the MONTHS it takes to get the stat requirements AND go through the process of completing all quests just to be able to trade freely. They will just move on to a different game, which is Jagex wants. That's why I think the cap needs to be higher for those with max or close to max Quest Points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naruto_1001 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 :D I just realized lending means we can lend our precious Holiday Items to friends to wear, without fear that they may run away with them. I'll laugh if they die....wearing the rare. Hopefully the rare is returned or -.- ^ Wouldn't work.. If any borrowed item was returned to the owner upon death then all you'd need to do is borrow the items you wanted to use in (for example) Bounty Hunter and hey presto no risk of losing items.. I'm not sure how they'll implement it, but it's obvious that a lot of thought needs to go into it to prevent people taking advantage of something like the above, but also to protect the lender from losing their stuff. Personally, I'm not sure that this idea will work too well. Although there are some easy solutions - for example with Bounty Hunter "you may not enter this area as the items you are holding are borrowed" but there are plenty of other places in the game where it is possible to die, and would be advantageous if you didn't lose any of the items you're holding when you do. Additionally, if there was no risk in lending out items, consider the number of people that will turn into 'borrowing noobs' the old "free stoof plox" will turn into "borrow ur phat plox" overnight! I was reading this topic till the end hoping nobody said this before I would, but well you did :D I wanted to say the same and I totally agree with you. A F2Per would lend his Full Rune to his friend and then his friend is going to kill some giant spiders, when he dies he goes to the prayer altar in Lumbridge where his friend will stand with the full rune and he can go die again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordanweb Posted December 17, 2007 Author Share Posted December 17, 2007 I'm sorry, are you still butt-hurt after that time someone pked you at green drags? :cry: Poor pixel-hugging carebear. I'm sure there's a support group somewhere... Lol good one. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truffoo Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 They will have to take their time to work through the lending system. Imagine: meet a new person and you ask to borrow their whip to try it out. You go off together to DK's or other high-level monster. You're both fighting away and he logs out. You lose your whip and begin fighting DK's with your bare hands. He then logs back in and loots your gravestone. I'm sure there are people out there who would be that mean. WARNING: Prone to ramble ... but you probably already know that!1% F2P : 99% RL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonlordjl Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 They will have to take their time to work through the lending system. Imagine: meet a new person and you ask to borrow their whip to try it out. You go off together to DK's or other high-level monster. You're both fighting away and he logs out. You lose your whip and begin fighting DK's with your bare hands. He then logs back in and loots your gravestone. I'm sure there are people out there who would be that mean. 1) They stated that upon logging out, you would receive the item back. 2) You cannot loot other peoples' graves. Once the grave crumbles, your items go buh-bye. Therefore, there is NO profiting off others' deaths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solidus_77 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Well that's just perfect! Since they have decided to fix up lootshare then that means that I have absolutely nothing against this update. Awesome! : They will have to take their time to work through the lending system. Imagine: meet a new person and you ask to borrow their whip to try it out. You go off together to DK's or other high-level monster. You're both fighting away and he logs out. You lose your whip and begin fighting DK's with your bare hands. He then logs back in and loots your gravestone. I'm sure there are people out there who would be that mean. We can't loot gravestones. The friend's only incentive to do such a thing would be to try and hurt you (for no gain). That, or an accidental dc. 76th to reach 99 Construction on 6th of February 2007379th to reach 99 Runecrafting on 4th of November 2007 Finally the secrets of goal achieving are revealed! (give my guide a read :^_^: ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spirrus Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Wow.....I'm glad I decided to wait it out. At least after these updates they can build on it and make them better. Damn.....I feel sorry for those who tossed away all their stuff then quit. :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berrakus Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 If all items that you lend out are returned to you when the person that you lent it to dies, then any duo that likes to kill Boss monsters will just swap equipment before they go. That way if either person dies, no items are lost (except for drops that person got, but Jagex may even eliminate that with their "LootShare to GE" fix). Dragon Drops - 10 Meds, 9 Legs, 5 Skirts, 2 Left HalfPM me to have any potions made or crafting done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayjest Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Many of those ideas sound.. familiar. :D Glad to see they are planning to take action. The GE changes should be done before they cut off trading, though. Hehe, as I was reading it I thought "Hang on, I swear I've seen this list on TruthScape... possibly in the same order". Goals to get my skills back up to a barely respectable level on the high scores: Currently going for Bone to Peaches spell. It's amazing how boring doing the same repetitive task is! Stupid MTA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sy_Accursed Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 :D I just realized lending means we can lend our precious Holiday Items to friends to wear, without fear that they may run away with them. I'll laugh if they die....wearing the rare. Hopefully the rare is returned or -.- ^ Wouldn't work.. If any borrowed item was returned to the owner upon death then all you'd need to do is borrow the items you wanted to use in (for example) Bounty Hunter and hey presto no risk of losing items.. I'm not sure how they'll implement it, but it's obvious that a lot of thought needs to go into it to prevent people taking advantage of something like the above, but also to protect the lender from losing their stuff. Personally, I'm not sure that this idea will work too well. Although there are some easy solutions - for example with Bounty Hunter "you may not enter this area as the items you are holding are borrowed" but there are plenty of other places in the game where it is possible to die, and would be advantageous if you didn't lose any of the items you're holding when you do. Additionally, if there was no risk in lending out items, consider the number of people that will turn into 'borrowing noobs' the old "free stoof plox" will turn into "borrow ur phat plox" overnight! I was reading this topic till the end hoping nobody said this before I would, but well you did :D I wanted to say the same and I totally agree with you. A F2Per would lend his Full Rune to his friend and then his friend is going to kill some giant spiders, when he dies he go get prayer in Lumbridge where his friend will stand with the full rune and he can go die again. Undoubtably Jagex will impose limits on WHERE u can use lended items and WHAT items can be lent. What happens with death will be an interesting one to see. Operation Gold Sparkles :: Chompy Kills :: Full Profound :: Champions :: Barbarian Notes :: Champions Tackle Box :: MA RewardsDragonkin Journals :: Ports Stories :: Elder Chronicles :: Boss Slayer :: Penance King :: Kal'gerion Titles :: Gold Statue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spooferfish Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Awesome. Simply put, awesome. See, they are trying to fix this, and make the game still playable.. paw claw, thats why they are looking into it carefully..they cant let things like that happen.. id imagine if they die the item goes back to the owner ? Quest points for staking limits...another shot at pures? :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vansing Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 The item lnding feature sounds great \ Yay :XD: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfntjy Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 They could impose a penalty for dying while wearing/holding lent items. You could lose your ability to borrow anything for a day, or a week, perhaps. -nat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peronix Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Yeah I just had a bad thought... If they release the lending feature there is going to be a LOT more "Can I try on ur phat plz". Just because it's safe dosen't mean it will be any less annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jessy87 Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 Yeah I just had a bad thought... If they release the lending feature there is going to be a LOT more "Can I try on ur phat plz". Just because it's safe dosen't mean it will be any less annoying. what if they dropped it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now