Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Tip.It Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Wilderness and free trade vote! - Now Closed

576 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Jagex reintroduce free trade and the old Wilderness?

    • Yes.
      60%
      351
    • No.
      29%
      169
    • Indifferent ...
      9%
      56

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

I'll jump on the band-wagon. You have to be a [developmentally delayed] to get scammed. I got scammed only once (if you can really call it a scam). I had ~150k and some dude came near the mining guild (I was mining the gold ore near it) and said he can trim any runite item for free ... I already knew this was impossible but I gave him my rune full helm (don't ask why I mined gold ores in full rune) just to be able to report him :ugeek:. Sadly .. he didn't got banned =/

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Views 214.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Really glad they put this out quickly, now people can't complain that it is an unfair way of gauging how many people actually want the update. 89% in favour as of now...

Looks like wildy & free trade's return is inevitable. Now the big question is when.

Sephy.png

Really glad they put this out quickly, now people can't complain that it is an unfair way of gauging how many people actually want the update. 89% in favour as of now...

 

Me too. I think this puts the claims of the insecure voting system and lack of info to rest now. Cheers, Jagex.

 

Hmmm I wonder how many "phases" are going to be ... There is a lot of time 'til the end of the fiasco (14 january if I remember right)

 

The use of the name 'Referendum' strongly suggests that this is the last word on the matter. If it succeeds (although the definition of success is still up to Jagex here, it's probably something like 70% yes votes or something), then the motion gets passed.

EDIT: I'm convinced that Phase 2 was invented as a response to criticism of the flawed vote of the 'petition', as opposed to something which they planned all along. After all, the first vote wasn't called Phase 1 at any point. It's a bit shady, but at least it resolves the issues.

~ W ~

 

sigzi.png

Great, now the proper voting begins.

 

There's probably gonna be much less than 1M votes this time >_<

WorldOfAVR_Part1_Avacyn_ajg5pfqs0fs.png

I'm still unhappy that people still feel the need to rig the votes voting on various accounts. If you think your side has so much chance, vote on your main account. It does disgust me just how much the Rs community is willing to cheat in what is a measure of good faith by Jagex.

 

I have been swayed in this thread, and I have voted that I'm not bothered. I am unsure as to whether they can realistically detect the bots, but if they can, good to them.

 

Mainly, I am just offput by the Communities willingness to cheat. That's the main reason for me being unwilling to vote yes. I don't want to be part of the scum (yes, I find people who cheat in votes like this as scum)

Want to be my friend? Look under my name to the left<<< and click the 'Add as friend' button!

zqXeV.jpg

Big thanks to Stevepole for the signature!^

I'm still unhappy that people still feel the need to rig the votes voting on various accounts. If you think your side has so much chance, vote on your main account. It does disgust me just how much the Rs community is willing to cheat in what is a measure of good faith by Jagex.

 

I have been swayed in this thread, and I have voted that I'm not bothered. I am unsure as to whether they can realistically detect the bots, but if they can, good to them.

 

Mainly, I am just offput by the Communities willingness to cheat. That's the main reason for me being unwilling to vote yes. I don't want to be part of the scum (yes, I find people who cheat in votes like this as scum)

How is voting on multiple accounts cheating, I ask?

 

I have 5-6 accounts that I play REGULARLY, why shouldn't I vote them all in favor of yes? Seeing as they're all counted by Jagex as active accounts, me voting on only one of them would be like only voting 1/6th of a time..

  • Author

I'm still unhappy that people still feel the need to rig the votes voting on various accounts. If you think your side has so much chance, vote on your main account. It does disgust me just how much the Rs community is willing to cheat in what is a measure of good faith by Jagex.

 

I have been swayed in this thread, and I have voted that I'm not bothered. I am unsure as to whether they can realistically detect the bots, but if they can, good to them.

 

Mainly, I am just offput by the Communities willingness to cheat. That's the main reason for me being unwilling to vote yes. I don't want to be part of the scum (yes, I find people who cheat in votes like this as scum)

but will one vote make a difference?

I'm still unhappy that people still feel the need to rig the votes voting on various accounts. If you think your side has so much chance, vote on your main account. It does disgust me just how much the Rs community is willing to cheat in what is a measure of good faith by Jagex.

 

I have been swayed in this thread, and I have voted that I'm not bothered. I am unsure as to whether they can realistically detect the bots, but if they can, good to them.

 

Mainly, I am just offput by the Communities willingness to cheat. That's the main reason for me being unwilling to vote yes. I don't want to be part of the scum (yes, I find people who cheat in votes like this as scum)

 

How is that cheating? I'm sure there are lots of people, pkers and non-pkers alike, that have more than one account. I voted with the account I use right now and one other that I use sometimes to mess around in F2P, does that make me scum?

Because it is a vote to see how many people want free trade back. You're not 6 people so don't vote 6 times. If you think your side has such a large percentage, is there any need to cheat?

Want to be my friend? Look under my name to the left<<< and click the 'Add as friend' button!

zqXeV.jpg

Big thanks to Stevepole for the signature!^

Sigh... I have a bad feeling about this.

You're absolutely right. This is not going to end well. I sense a huuuuuge ge riot....merch clans running wild....people losing partyhats to [wagon] pkers....[wagon] pkers crashing innocent people at kbd....

It's gonna be bad. I voted no for a reason.

Bionic_Yoshi.png

 

 

TT rewards: 2 ranger boots, Zamorak page 1 (2x), Guthix page 1, Ancient page 2

 

You must construct additional oak larders doors... I mean pylons

 

Barrows: 10. Total value~22.3 mil. Ahrim Robeskirt is currently the item I have received the most.

  • Author

Sigh... I have a bad feeling about this.

You're absolutely right. This is not going to end well. I sense a huuuuuge ge riot....merch clans running wild....people losing partyhats to [wagon] pkers....# of people at kbd crashing...

It's gonna be bad. I voted no for a reason.

erm...how would you lose a partyhat to a pker?

Because it is a vote to see how many people want free trade back. You're not 6 people so don't vote 6 times. If you think your side has such a large percentage, is there any need to cheat?

 

What's stopping someone that wants to vote no using a secondary account to vote?

Although I agree with you Danq that it's not really fair to vote multiple times if you have more than one account, you can take solace in the idea that for every person who votes 'yes' with multiple accounts, there's about a proportionate number of people who vote 'no' with an equal number of accounts. As far as I'm aware, there's no correlation with how you feel about the issue and how many accounts you have.

~ W ~

 

sigzi.png

I'm not sure Will. I would assume that with pkers usually having numerous pures and secondaries, there would be larger number of players wanting yes with numerous accounts than those wanting no. To me though, it doesn't matter which side people vote as long as they do it legitimately. Just don't try to skew the votes. 1 person wants to vote yes, 1 person votes yes once. If not, we may as well go back to phase 1.

Want to be my friend? Look under my name to the left<<< and click the 'Add as friend' button!

zqXeV.jpg

Big thanks to Stevepole for the signature!^

Good to see that Jagex confirmed all wildy activities will be moved away, and existing content will not be removed (except PvP worlds ofc).

 

After reading this, sure why not Jagex. I'm fairly confident this time the game will not be ruined due to the lack of gold farmers now :thumbup:

douvdFX.jpg


 


Blog


Trimmed | Master Quester | Final Boss


Boss pets: Bombi | Shrimpy | Ellie | Tz-Rek Jad | Karil the Bobbled | Mega Ducklings


120s: Dungeoneering | Invention

Sigh... I have a bad feeling about this.

You're absolutely right. This is not going to end well. I sense a huuuuuge ge riot....merch clans running wild....people losing partyhats to [wagon] pkers....# of people at kbd crashing...

It's gonna be bad. I voted no for a reason.

erm...how would you lose a partyhat to a pker?

 

If the person is stupid enough to step foot in the Wilderness with a rare item and gets killed by a PKer, more power to the PKer who got lucky as hell for another person's misfortune (read: stupidity).

 

Also, couldn't give two [cabbage]s about 'merch clans running wild'.

 

.# of people at kbd crashing...

 

QQ

SWAG

 

Mayn U wanna be like me but U can't be me cuz U ain't got ma swagga on.

I'm still unhappy that people still feel the need to rig the votes voting on various accounts. If you think your side has so much chance, vote on your main account. It does disgust me just how much the Rs community is willing to cheat in what is a measure of good faith by Jagex.

 

I have been swayed in this thread, and I have voted that I'm not bothered. I am unsure as to whether they can realistically detect the bots, but if they can, good to them.

 

Mainly, I am just offput by the Communities willingness to cheat. That's the main reason for me being unwilling to vote yes. I don't want to be part of the scum (yes, I find people who cheat in votes like this as scum)

You'll cry about anything, won't ya? It's not as though only the supporters are the only ones against can vote on all accounts, everyone can vote on every account they have, so it's fair. Otherwise you'd just be dismissing people who have taken the time to make and train multiple accounts. Why should some of my accounts get a premium over the others when they were all created many years before the change(i realize that new accounts shouldn't be able to vote, but that's about really the only restriction).

First to 99 Farming on 27. September, 2005.

First to 3766 Port Score on 20. March, 2014.

First to 4664 Port Score on 2. March, 2015.

I'm not sure Will. I would assume that with pkers usually having numerous pures and secondaries, there would be larger number of players wanting yes with numerous accounts than those wanting no. To me though, it doesn't matter which side people vote as long as they do it legitimately. Just don't try to skew the votes. 1 person wants to vote yes, 1 person votes yes once. If not, we may as well go back to phase 1.

 

Good point. I'm not sure if there's really anything anybody can do about it. I voted 'yes' with one account, by the way. I support Jagex here, but not fanatically, since it still boils down to a vote on trust.

~ W ~

 

sigzi.png

And I am sure that .. you know .. a lot of the people who invested in more than one account broke .. you know .. this rule

http://www.runescape.com/c=nZ6YHFZGfFk/rules/rule_multiple_logging.ws

They don't necessarily log all of them on at the same time... <_<

douvdFX.jpg


 


Blog


Trimmed | Master Quester | Final Boss


Boss pets: Bombi | Shrimpy | Ellie | Tz-Rek Jad | Karil the Bobbled | Mega Ducklings


120s: Dungeoneering | Invention

  • Author

And I am sure that .. you know .. a lot of the people who invested in more than one account broke .. you know .. this rule

http://www.runescape.com/c=nZ6YHFZGfFk/rules/rule_multiple_logging.ws

er.

 

the first sentence

You may create more than one account, but if you do, you may not log in more than one account at any time, and they must not interact with each other in any way. This includes 'drop trading' or any other method of item transfer.

I meant the wealth transfer part. That's why I said a lot, not most or all ...

Voted no. When I saw the results from the 55k polled votes so far I wasn't too surprised tbh. 88% yes, 9% no and 3% don't mind.

34gU8.png

ezk120dg_zps0de40221.png

zP2k8Ej.png

7d95f5db02.png

Reacting impulsively and saying what's on your mind feels oh so good.. for a little, until you realize you just started WWIII.


2672nd person to reach 2496 total.
Thanks to Wicked for the awesome siggy :D

I do find it odd that theres no closing date for this election.

PvP is not for me

In the 3rd Year of the Boycott
Real-world money saved since FT/W: Hundreds of Dollars
Real-world time saved since FT/W: Thousands of Hours

Create an account or sign in to comment

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.