Me and my one friend have been arguing constantly over which was better, the combat skills, or the non-combat skills. What are your guys opinions, and why?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think it is non-combat since they give you more options, and make you more money in the long run then combat skills.

I just dislike the Runescape combat system. So non-combat skills for me.

i personally prefer skills over combat especially b/c with cb, in order to earn money you need the armor/weapons to do well and earn sufficient through it, while skilling you only need something like a lobby pot to make money. I'm the money type person lol 8-)

non combat skills basicly fuel the combat skills...hunter helps with it slayer gives you stuff for it....etc... so ill say non-combat skills are better

probly non-combat but magic is my fav skill by far

Apples are so much better than oranges. Man, I love apples.

Non Combat

defenetly non-combat

I really only like combat when I get bored of non-combats from doing them a lot, so I guess non-combat is better. Personally I like merchanting better than skills but thats just me :D

BOTH! :anxious:

non-combat supports the whole economey (magic is combat but highalc is not a combat spell), so from an economic perspective non-combat is veary important. Of course the non-combat support combat, if there was no combat than lobbys wouldnt be worth veary much, so you still need the combat to make everything work. Combat and non-combat are both important and one dose not work without the other. Now from a social perspective combat is more important because your cb lvl is what everyone sees and what many people will judge you on. Your name and cb lvl make your first impression (unless of course you say something but even still...).

COMBAT!!! YAY VIOLENCE!! :evil: :thumbsup:

COMBAT!!! YAY VIOLENCE!! :evil: :thumbsup:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, another violence lover! :XD:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I love combat. But my Loitering skill is level 99. I stand around in banks laughing at idiots waaaaay too much...

non combat since most of my non combat are at least 60+

I like non-combat more, but I wouldn't say one is better than the other overall.

I have always preferred non-combat, but I also do train Combat skills once in a while. Since I'm back to F2P, its all non-combat for now :

Apples are so much better than oranges. Man, I love apples.

 

 

 

Well said.

Both have their distinct advantages, though I cringe at high cmb lvls with low totals so...non-combat skills ftw.

Neither are greater or worse than the other. It all depends on how they are used and the preferences of the user. For me, both are equally great, as I enjoy doing both.

non combat skills basicly fuel the combat skills...hunter helps with it slayer gives you stuff for it....etc... so ill say non-combat skills are better

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I agree....if you want to continue with combat, you're going to need noncombat skills

 

Apples are so much better than oranges. Man, I love apples.

 

 

 

Well said.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

oranges are delicious bra

 

 

 

eat em equally

COMBAT IS PKING!

combat wats is more fun than killing stuff o.O

both :D just cuz i want to mine rune in the wildy... (i want 90 def...)

Variation is the best diet. Eath both apples and oranges.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The non-combat skills support the combat skills (and often also the other way around: slayer gets you herbs, seeds e.g.). They are both inseparable parts of the intricate web that is called gameplay.