ixfd64 Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 In late 2002, Jagex added rule 11, which states that players cannot advertise websites. However, probably due to the fear of a backlash, Jagex did not announce the rule on the main page, and some people were banned for advertising legitimate sites (such as tip.it). Jagex claims that this is to prevent phishing scams. True, if people did not advertise, then phishing scams would be useless. Unfortunately, scammers don't care about the rules. They will create "disposable" accounts that they could care less about if they were banned. Essentially, all rule 11 does is punish legitimate players, who can't tell their friends to "check out tip.it for quest guides" without the fear of getting banned. What do you think? Personally, I think that this rule is useless, and does nothing to stop scammers. As pro-gun people say in regards to gun-free zones: criminal nutjobs do not care about the law. ARENAscape: Baratus [AS] max hit: 166 with Moon Battle Hammer ixfd64 [AS] max hit: 116 with (untitled spell #2) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenin64 Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 I disagree somewhat, thsi rule at least gives the impression to outsiders & players that they are trying to do something about it, despite the ineffectiveness. Command the Murderous Chalices! Drink ye harpooners! drink and swear, ye men that man the deathful whaleboat's bow- Death to Moby Dick!BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mchainmail Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 The rule does have a purpose. However, I will question the enforcement of it. If a player advertises a "clean" site, the most they should get (1st offense) is a 1-7 day mute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddaanniiellh Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 The rule does have a purpose. However, I will question the enforcement of it. If a player advertises a "clean" site, the most they should get (1st offense) is a 1-7 day mute. +1, I think that the punishment is a bit strict To the thread author: I understand what you are trying to say, but still, if this rule wasn't put in place, then those phishers and scammers would also have free reign. They need this rule in place for a basis of punishment for these "phishers/scammers" ~Ddaanniiellh : 1437 : 173Lowest Combat to 1,000 Total in F2P (23 Combat)Check me out on YouTube! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InkofDeath Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 What your saying is quite true, however, having the rule does decrease the amount of those who don't want to go through the hassle of phishing, though, you will get scammed if the person is dedicated. This rule also does put an imprint of positivity amongst new, and semi-old players, that gives users the satisfaction Jagex is still trying to do something to help the players. I think legit FanSites, and clan forums however should be allowed to be advertised, if not, the punishment for legit sites shouldn't be a ban, more like a 2 hour mute. :-# Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Observer Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 I feel that the person should receive a number of black marks if they mention a legit site. If it's a scam site, they should receive a 3 day mute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walka92 Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 I feel that the person should receive a number of black marks if they mention a legit site. If it's a scam site, they should receive a 3 day mute. shouldnt that be the other way round? I'm gonna be walking down an alley in varrock, and walka is going to walk up to me in a trench coat and say "psst.. hey man, wanna buy some sara brew"walka92- retired with 99 in attack, strength, defence, health, magic, ranged, prayer and herblore and 137 combat. some day i may return to claim 138 combat, but alas, that time has not yet come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Adam Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 go to w/ww._______.com for AWESOME RuneScape tips and forum members who buy stuff for TONS of $$$!!!! w/ww._______.com contains: Trojan Spyware Keylogger and more!!!! But you get a good guide. : EDIT: Made it so the .com isn't a link... even though it isn't real anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_Ewan_1 Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 Rule 11 gives them a reason to ban tonnes of scammers/phisers etc... It delays them so that it will be a few hours longer before they can advertise again. If they get like 3 accounts banned every week, he may eventually give up, one would hope! Goals achieved: lvl 99 Cooking, Fishing and Fletching.Surrey CC and Liverpool FC fan for life! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgisme Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 Have you not seen all of the advertising bots lately? They are trying to get players to buy RS gold or go to a website that will steal their account. Although I understand where you're coming from with the disposable account argument, the ingame bot advertising problem would be much worse without this rule. Hopefully if enough of these bots get banned, they will get tired of making new accounts and sending them through tutorial island. Also, without this rule, more innocent players would have their accounts stolen from visiting an advertised website and more players might be influenced to buy RS gold. Rule 11 is not meant to punish players that mention a major fansite in passing, it protects players accounts more that anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dizzle229 Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 it should be revised. saying a site multiple times should get you banned but just saying once on private chat should not. Get back here so I can rub your butt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Italian5kamikaze Posted October 28, 2007 Share Posted October 28, 2007 The rules fine. Jagex cant go through every site checking if its clean or a scam site theres absolutely no reason why you have to say a site in game, if your trying to help someone out add them on an instant messenger or something. Quit. PM me if you play The Conduit to exchange friend codes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
la la la Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 It's frustrating, but if the rule was not there, there would be more people advertising, even higher-level players. When I see a level 3 advertising a website, I know it is gonna be malicious, but if a level 123 is advertising a malicious website, the lower-levels might go just in interest and end up in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkw0101 Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 good rule but, there should atleast be a list of sites that you can advertise that have jagex approval Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldDucky Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 In late 2002, Jagex added rule 11, which states that players cannot advertise websites. However, probably due to the fear of a backlash, Jagex did not announce the rule on the main page, and some people were banned for advertising legitimate sites (such as tip.it). Jagex claims that this is to prevent phishing scams. True, if people did not advertise, then phishing scams would be useless. Unfortunately, scammers don't care about the rules. They will create "disposable" accounts that they could care less about if they were banned. Essentially, all rule 11 does is punish legitimate players, who can't tell their friends to "check out tip.it for quest guides" without the fear of getting banned. What do you think? Personally, I think that this rule is useless, and does nothing to stop scammers. As pro-gun people say in regards to gun-free zones: criminal nutjobs do not care about the law.It doesn't matter if it was not posted on the front page. Players should read Runescape's Rules Frequently. There is no word against Jagex In that rule. Yes, It makes Runescape loose buisness somtimes. Also, It gets players hacked. Without the rule many players would be uptight about the loosing of their accounts. Everyone Runescape rule is neccessery, That is why jagex put it as one. Jagex wouldn't make a rule for nothing. O'Ducky ~ HYT Chat Rules (Click Here): Read before entering the chat. ~| Former Clan Chronicle Editor | Former Clan Improvement Member| Former TET Member | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJGM Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Its not very useless, because if there wasn't a rule.. what would you report those idiots who advertise sites that sell RSGP for IRL money? My blog to *100cb F2P* :XD: Check it out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mchainmail Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Its not very useless, because if there wasn't a rule.. what would you report those idiots who advertise sites that sell RSGP for IRL money? Real World Trading? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giordano Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I do get where Jagex are coming with the creation of this rule, but I do not believe they should punish people who mention major good sites like Tip.It "The cry of the poor is not always just, but if you never hear it you'll never know what justice is." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craven_Image Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I don't think they ban people for providing links to legitimate sites; clan sites or fan sites. If they say 'buy free gold here - *' then that would be against the rules. Other sites such as clan sites I don't think they ban people for. 99 Magic, 99 Defence, 99 Strength, 99 Attack, 99 Hitpoints, 99 Fletching, 99 Woodcutting, 99 Firemaking, 99 Thieving, 99 Ranged, 99 Prayer, 99 Cooking, 99 Fishing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ugafan_2009 Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 The rules fine. Jagex cant go through every site checking if its clean or a scam site theres absolutely no reason why you have to say a site in game, if your trying to help someone out add them on an instant messenger or something.Asking for an instant message name would also be against the rules and reportable. Quit RS, combat 104, total 1651 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodArgon Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Iv yet to get muted for advertising YouTube to tell someone to see my videos :-# 99 Crafting :: 39,750th || 99 Attack :: 1,775th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makoto_the_Phoenix Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 Iv yet to get muted for advertising YouTube to tell someone to see my videos :-# Knock on wood. I'm dead serious. Rule 11 actually is quite beneficial to the community, since it keeps people from advertising their bot programs, their gold-trading sites, and most of all, it keeps fansites from getting a leg-up on others from having a boost of advertisement in-game. (Word of mouth served 'em well for nigh on seven years; why should it steer them wrong now?) Linux User/Enthusiast | Full-Stack Software Engineer | Stack Overflow Member | GIMP User...Alright, the Elf City update lured me back to RS over a year ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doomy Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 I think it should only count for runescape-related websites. The wording is messed up anyway, advertising is deiferent from saying the name. Doomy edit: I like sheep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonis Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 At the best moments there are currently hundreds of ad bots all around the game. Not that they are just RL traders, scam and steal players' accounts, it must be welcomed how clear it is that advertising really is against the rules. Ones who first break the rule to advertise their money selling sites probably know about the rule, but ones who enter these sites very often don't, so also it is there to protect ones who yet hadn't read the rules. Also if telling someone an adress of the site they yet didn't know then how the one knows it's legit and doesn't do any harm? If understanding the above, it should be clear that Jagex has very good points to ask players not to talk about any website adresses in game. Again, just need to study how to cope with it (if there is anything to cope with). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reztral Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 They need to clarify the rule a little bit because some people think that you are not allowed to say the name of any website, regardless of context. I do support the rule overall though. --8727th person to achieve 99 Fishing on 8/19/2008----6012th person to achieve 99 Thieving on 10/12/2008--R.I.P. October 31, 2013 99 Fletching 7/16/2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now