http://www.gametrailers.com/player/49095.html

 

 

 

Here's a trailer. Enjoy.

Vehicles are a yes. Underwater combat is a yes. New melee combat? Likely.

 

 

 

Neat.

Vehicles are a yes. Underwater combat is a yes. New melee combat? Likely.

 

 

 

Neat.

 

Vehicles needs to be a no. And unless I get to ride on a shark I don't think underwater combat will be too much fun.

Vehicles are a yes. Underwater combat is a yes. New melee combat? Likely.

 

 

 

Neat.

 

Vehicles needs to be a no. And unless I get to ride on a shark I don't think underwater combat will be too much fun.

 

I agree x50 to both of those comments.

Don't forget Price's awesome beard.

 

 

 

And a big [bleep] off to vehicles. Underwater combat just wouldn't fit properly. It appears to be in the trailer, but I'd be very surprised if it was included online. Maybe incorporated into some kind of marshy map, where you could hold your breath under the water or something.

I don't know, I just like the feel of the MP44. Plus, it sounds mad.

 

 

 

I still don't see why Prestige is such an amazing thing to have, maybe if it gave you an incentive to do it, I'd consider it worth getting.

 

It shows that you can kick [wagon].

 

 

 

Nah it just shows how you abuse the SMG's in every CoD game :P

 

I like 65 no prestige. Anyone else?:P

I don't know, I just like the feel of the MP44. Plus, it sounds mad.

 

 

 

I still don't see why Prestige is such an amazing thing to have, maybe if it gave you an incentive to do it, I'd consider it worth getting.

 

It shows that you can kick [wagon].

 

 

 

Nah it just shows how you abuse the SMG's in every CoD game :P

 

I like 65 no prestige. Anyone else?:P

 

 

 

It's not even an SMG, and SMGs are only really abused on WaW. I thought 65 no prestige on WaW looked rubbish. 55 no prestige on cod4 looks ok though.

Underwater combat? No.

 

Vehicles? Maybe, definitely not the calibur of the tanks on WaW.

 

Hand to hand combat? Only as an alternative to the knife, or they can fix the kniving system.

New teaser on TNT may 24th :ohnoes: check part of it out On Youtube btw

or they can fix the kniving system.

 

 

 

Please. I'm getting extremely tired of flying through people when I knife them.

Vehicles are a yes. Underwater combat is a yes. New melee combat? Likely.

 

 

 

Neat.

 

Vehicles needs to be a no. And unless I get to ride on a shark I don't think underwater combat will be too much fun.

 

 

 

Why do vehicles need to be a no? The only problem with tanks in Cod WaW was that it was dumb to JUST have tanks.

I liked the motorcycles and stuff in cod3. The tanks sucked, all the games on certain maps were just tanks dominating everyone.

From what I'm hearing, it just makes me want the game to come out sooner. I'm probably going to have to avoid this thread just to keep my patient for wanting the game.

Vehicles are a yes. Underwater combat is a yes. New melee combat? Likely.

 

 

 

Neat.

 

Vehicles needs to be a no. And unless I get to ride on a shark I don't think underwater combat will be too much fun.

 

 

 

Why do vehicles need to be a no? The only problem with tanks in Cod WaW was that it was dumb to JUST have tanks.

 

 

 

 

 

Nah they were just tanks.

 

 

 

I mean .. Couldn't do much with bullets .. fair enough .. But they had WAY too much health and WAY to much fire power. Why snipe when you can blast a rocket at the guy and hit the 2 guys next to him from the other end of the map?

http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2009/05/12/ ... 2-details/

 

 

 

=D> =D> =D> :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Hopefully that will turn out to be untrue. I could stand tanks if balanced right, but if vehicles feature prominently online I will simply return to cod4.

Sometimes I think that the only reason people are againsts vehicles is because other people say it #-o

 

 

 

Take H3 as an example, in the right circumstances vehicle combat is epic.

 

 

 

Cod6 should take that to the next level. Of course, it should stay mainly a ground based game, but it does need an array of vehicles. Just not so damn overpowered as the tanks in WaW.

To me one of the reasons why cod4 was so good was that it didn't have vehicles.

Hopefully that will turn out to be untrue. I could stand tanks if balanced right, but if vehicles feature prominently online I will simply return to cod4.

 

 

 

It is true. From Infinity Ward vis PSM3.

Oo, goodie. I get to rant about vehicles in Modern Warfare 2. Alright, here is the deal. Some games have 256 players simultaneously, others have Vehicles, CoD should NOT have this. I love the 1on1 combat and the small maps. As soon as you introduce vehicles maps are huge and combat is all about who gets that tank first. Or an RPG one hits it, and then you just have big maps with useless vehicles. Prime example here is Halo, that game is freakin awesome on small maps. Remember the Halo 2 map, the ice one? The one that was not even in normal online and unless you got a vehicle, spent the next 5 minutes looking for a frag.

 

 

 

That's why, us CoD players love the 1 on 1 we get and would not want to see that traded for [cabbage]ty vehicles, hell even good vehicles I'll pass.(That's not to say it shouldn't be in single player)

 

 

 

P.S. This game isn't CoD6. Its Modern Warfare 2, Activision gave the reigns over to Infinity Ward because they were tired of being associated with Treyarch's games and Activision's "one CoD game a year plix".

 

P.S. This game isn't CoD6. Its Modern Warfare 2, Activision gave the reigns over to Infinity Ward because they were tired of being associated with Treyarch's games and Activision's "one CoD game a year plix".

 

 

 

It's canon with Cod4, therefore it shall be viewed as CoD6.

 

P.S. This game isn't CoD6. Its Modern Warfare 2, Activision gave the reigns over to Infinity Ward because they were tired of being associated with Treyarch's games and Activision's "one CoD game a year plix".

 

 

 

You do know the only reason they made that deal (between activision and Treyarch and IW) was so that they could drop games yearly? That is the only reason they made that deal. Every 2 years would be too long.

 

 

 

But Cod4 is amazing without tanks. I can't think of a map that would be good with tanks on cod4. I absolutely hate Roundhouse and Seelow. Outskirts and Downfall are bad too but not as bad as the other two.

 

Everytime I come across Seelow or Roundhouse I skip because those maps are just terrible.

 

 

 

I pray to God the tanks are only on 1 or 2 maps. Not 4 in WaW.

Or have seperate matchlists for vehicles and without.

I don't see why you're all bashing vehicles. The game's nowhere near finished, we don't have any concrete details on what vehicles will be in it online.

 

 

 

Tanks were crap in COD5 because Treyarch rushed them, as they did with a lot in that game.

 

 

 

Have faith in IW, they're a great developer, I'm sure they'll be able to make it work.

Wait, when did IW say they were going to make a game yearly?(Unless I misread) It's been there stance that they don't want to be rushed into making games yearly.(Hence why the Big Red One and World at War are by Treyarch) And every two years is not a long time, you never get a good thing by rushing it. I remember reading an article where one of the underdog companies still owned by a corporation stated that if it weren't for deadlines and the fact that they were rushed out for a holiday season or something they would spend months on it still polishing the game.

 

 

 

Random tangent aside, I'm glad you feel the same way about tanks.

 

 

 

Or have seperate matchlists for vehicles and without.

 

 

 

If a company can pull it off more power to them. I'll always take the stance that even though I don't like something, as long as it has no effects on me personally I will support you when I see fit. That said I wouldn't like to see a company necessarily do that as we've seen games before that have tried to separate the marriage of two gameplay types and it usually ends up with one being inferior to the other or both being inferior when one should of been concentrated on.

 

 

 

@Insanity

 

The game itself may not be done but the core gameplay more then likely is. The game is only several months off. And the reason we bash it is because we either feel we wouldn't like it or have had bad past experiences with vehicles. For FPS I don't mind them enhancing single player with it, but when you have it mucking around in multi player that turns me off.