F2p Mage Proposal *Read it now!* 105 supporters!!!!

[doomtom99]

i support

 

 

 

i like the new mage outfit :thumbsup:

[super_craz2]

yes i realize you think im being rude but its the truth, you don tpay you dont get, if jagex makes you hate f2p so badly you want to get p2p they just did there job. f2p is suppose to make you want p2p. Your just being ignorant by wanting things you dont deserve.

 

 

 

and about how you cant afford it, thats a lazy excuse. If you can afford a computer and pay a monthly bill for internet you can afford 5 dollars a month. And if by some reason you couldnt i could think of lots of things that could earn you 5 dollars a month even if you werent old enough for a real job...

 

 

 

 

 

i agree with him ^^ ( read the qoute )

[The Real ET]

I'm P2P and support this whole heartily. :thumbsup:

 

F2P got that range upgrade awhile ago, I never understood why they didn't get mage as well. :-k

[IAm314159]

Support! Improve the strength of F2P Mages!

[Ninjaboy563]

I say this to all f2p rally posts (i actually saved this to a word file so i can use cut and paste....

 

 

 

 

 

f2p is a demo not the full game version and was never inteded for what it has become. Thats y there is members. If we add all these things to f2p there is no reason for members then. Im sorry if you cant become a member but stop with all the whining

[foodmonkey11]

Mages do need better stuff. Your blue mage design isn't that great though

[tex218]

I definately agree to this which i mostly don't agree to f2p things but they need something for mage and thats a fact

[Aussie_Pkz]

so u know theres like 1 million members so im assuming there a lot more than that in f2p...

[Dracion1]

Something like green dragonhide would be nice, but no more spells are really needed. It's not that mage is under powered, but that if you do get hit, there's little added on to your current defence to make certain places to train worth it.

[Necromancer_Magic]

yes i realize you think im being rude but its the truth, you don tpay you dont get, if jagex makes you hate f2p so badly you want to get p2p they just did there job. f2p is suppose to make you want p2p. Your just being ignorant by wanting things you dont deserve.

 

 

 

and about how you cant afford it, thats a lazy excuse. If you can afford a computer and pay a monthly bill for internet you can afford 5 dollars a month. And if by some reason you couldnt i could think of lots of things that could earn you 5 dollars a month even if you werent old enough for a real job...

 

 

 

 

 

Worked on me : lol.

[the1stfool]

I say this to all f2p rally posts (i actually saved this to a word file so i can use cut and paste....

 

 

 

 

 

f2p is a demo not the full game version and was never inteded for what it has become. Thats y there is members. If we add all these things to f2p there is no reason for members then. Im sorry if you cant become a member but stop with all the whining

 

F2P is not a demo. I'm sick of all of the member noobs who think this :evil: . P2P is only a way to support Jagex in return for more stuff to play with (and we also pay with ads). Anyway, I support this idea :thumbsup: . F2P mages are seriously underpowered and need to have better robes.

[gg_kk90]

im p2p but i support the good idea

[Omali]

I say this to all f2p rally posts (i actually saved this to a word file so i can use cut and paste....

 

 

 

 

 

f2p is a demo not the full game version and was never inteded for what it has become. Thats y there is members. If we add all these things to f2p there is no reason for members then. Im sorry if you cant become a member but stop with all the whining

 

 

 

Yea, you cut and paste it because, in reality, you just have nothing important or intellectual to say.

 

 

 

Free play is not a demo, it's the game. Members is an enhanced version of the game. And as for how f2p was originally intended, when Andrew Gower first created Runescape, he never intended the game to grow as much as it did. Even so, he never foresaw even the inclusion of members until the need to funds was right in his face. So if anything, the entirety of p2p isn't as intended.

 

 

 

Your second argument makes just as little sense and makes you sound just as self righteous and immature. Ok, we can't give f2p better mage robes. Because clearly that'll ruin the point of becoming a member for better weapons, better armor, better fish, better training spots, better skills, better potions, better clothes, more quests, more map area, less bots, less immature scammers, minigames, the achievement diaries, more rune mining spots, better monsters, and forum usage. Anything I missed? Feel free to mention it.

 

 

 

Here's a little advice. The next time you see a thread with a suggestion about f2p, remember this saying: "It's better to be thought of as an idiot, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"

[the1stfool]

I say this to all f2p rally posts (i actually saved this to a word file so i can use cut and paste....

 

 

 

 

 

f2p is a demo not the full game version and was never inteded for what it has become. Thats y there is members. If we add all these things to f2p there is no reason for members then. Im sorry if you cant become a member but stop with all the whining

 

 

 

Yea, you cut and paste it because, in reality, you just have nothing important or intellectual to say.

 

 

 

Free play is not a demo, it's the game. Members is an enhanced version of the game. And as for how f2p was originally intended, when Andrew Gower first created Runescape, he never intended the game to grow as much as it did. Even so, he never foresaw even the inclusion of members until the need to funds was right in his face. So if anything, the entirety of p2p isn't as intended.

 

 

 

Your second argument makes just as little sense and makes you sound just as self righteous and immature. Ok, we can't give f2p better mage robes. Because clearly that'll ruin the point of becoming a member for better weapons, better armor, better fish, better training spots, better skills, better potions, better clothes, more quests, more map area, less bots, less immature scammers, minigames, the achievement diaries, more rune mining spots, better monsters, and forum usage. Anything I missed? Feel free to mention it.

 

 

 

Here's a little advice. The next time you see a thread with a suggestion about f2p, remember this saying: "It's better to be thought of as an idiot, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"

 

Couldn't have said it better myself... :thumbsup:

[decebal]

I support! I remember I always wear my zombie trousers on with zombie gloves, and I want the mage bonus! Only 25, what can you do with it?

 

 

 

But with spells, this is where we're going too far: Why? Well, a mage would be hitting higher than a meller with the same speed of wep, and ranged allways hit very low, so ya, robes are alright for me.

[unkn0wnwarrior]

I support! I remember I always wear my zombie trousers on with zombie gloves, and I want the mage bonus! Only 25, what can you do with it?

 

 

 

But with spells, this is where we're going too far: Why? Well, a mage would be hitting higher than a meller with the same speed of wep, and ranged allways hit very low, so ya, robes are alright for me.

Magic would still hit lower than melee, no matter what weapon the melee weapon may be. And range hits low because it also hits faster.

 

 

 

Although, the only new spell I support is the use of Snare.

[Barihawk]

I fully support this proposal. It would balance out F2P pking for those of us members who enjoy having wars on F2P servers. And if members can make a little money off of it, why not?

 

 

 

f2p is a demo not the full game version and was never inteded for what it has become. Thats y there is members. If we add all these things to f2p there is no reason for members then. Im sorry if you cant become a member but stop with all the whining

 

 

 

When P2P was released, F2P was the entire game. Both Andrew and Paul think of P2P as a weekly expansion pack. F2P is *not* a demo.

 

 

 

And I can't imagine a set of robes being "All these things" that would make me stop paying my $5 a month.

 

 

 

And it seems to me the elitist P2P fools are the ones who are whining.

[champion]

Support add meh to the list \

[the1stfool]

I fully support this proposal. It would balance out F2P pking for those of us members who enjoy having wars on F2P servers. And if members can make a little money off of it, why not?

 

 

 

Standard Elitist Fool[/u]":322sb6pj]f2p is a demo not the full game version and was never inteded for what it has become. Thats y there is members. If we add all these things to f2p there is no reason for members then. Im sorry if you cant become a member but stop with all the whining

 

 

 

When P2P was released, F2P was the entire game. Both Andrew and Paul think of P2P as a weekly expansion pack. F2P is *not* a demo.

 

 

 

And I can't imagine a set of robes being "All these things" that would make me stop paying my $5 a month.

 

 

 

And it seems to me the elitist P2P fools are the ones who are whining.

 

Lol, I love what you did with the dude's name :lol: .

[magicrune]

Aren't mage boots for f2p too (from treasure trial)?

 

 

 

But anyway, I do believe you are right, f2p should need a better armour, requiring 40 magic, to balance stuff.

[Moonshadow]

Aren't mage boots for f2p too (from treasure trial)?

 

 

 

But anyway, I do believe you are right, f2p should need a better armour, requiring 40 magic, to balance stuff.

 

Try looking it up before you say it :roll:. If you did, you would already know the answer. But, yes, I do agree with this.

[davidium]

Magic would still hit lower than melee, no matter what weapon the melee weapon may be. And range hits low because it also hits faster.

err thats precisely the reason for this thread isnt it? o.O magic is supposed to own melee in the combat triangle and it does but ONLY in members which is why f2p needs btr mage equipment to balance out the combat triangle. one rune scim has more attack bonus than all the mage equip put together and ppl say its balanced :-w

 

and txlnghorns22 just because someone owns a computer doesnt mean u are rich enough to pay for members...i see no link nor logic in your argument. thats a totally sweeping statement...besides there are other reasons given why ppl cant get membership in the author's first post...please READ before you start opening your mouth

[Daviduhlich]

What's it worth killing a mage in f2p? Next to nothing, you get runes and maybe some food. The p2p equivalent is a 1-itemer with a dds. Annoying and painful, but not really worth the fight. I don't like it the way you suggested it, but if Jagex could improve f2p mage without overpowering it, and give them some gear that was worth something, then I'd be all for it.

[mchainmail]

wow, this topic has been going for a while. I'll support. However, the blue text in the topic is quite annoying, and somewhat against tip.it rules (that you can't post in all one color).

[Master_Smither]

Very nice idea!

 

 

 

I remember in f2p I had the blue mage armour o wait i still do :o

 

 

 

It's just something i kept in my bank

 

 

 

I support 100%