Loved it as soon as I saw it, great work everyone :)

Woohoo! This looks so amazing!

 

Thanks to everyone involved.

Looks great! Only gripe is the font inconsistencies.

 

What do you mean?

The combination of having at least two different font types (maybe more, I can't tell how many there are) with the varying font sizes makes it feel inconsistent/busy. Only to a small degree, but it feels off/not uniform to me. Maybe try sticking to just 3-4 variations of font size and one font character and see how it compares?

 

The other thing I would change is under "Runescape" I would align the icons and text to the left rather than center them. The combination of the text below them being shifted left and the actual small icons not lining up with each other feels off.

Absolutely wonderful!! Goodjob and great work to all contributors.

Love the new look :D great work

WOW :o That looks fantastic! Good job guys!

I was asking myself lately why this wasn't there yet, because it has been long under construction (and promised to be there already a few years ago). Now I know why it has taken so long and I am glad you did it that way :D Huge congrats to all of you!

I saw it ages ago, but it turned out really nice. Big improvement I'd say. |^_^|

Gorgeous. Fantastic work everyone.

It looks really nice. The fonts appear a bit wonky on Linux, but I suspect that's a matter of font selection and not much else.

 

I'm a bit surprised there isn't a mobile option. I do use the site when I'm on my smartphone, and having that as an option (especially for lower bandwidth) would be advantageous.

Looks absolutely fantastic, great work. :thumbup:

Just as I was wondering if a site update would ever come. :P

Looks nice! A nice improvement (especially the left bar) but from reading all the comments so far I was almost expecting a complete overhaul of the site structure.

Most looks the same and familiar but with improved visuals. I like :D

Awesome. Been looking forward to this for so long. Had to have been 2-3 years ago when I first heard about it and saw the initial designs.

I'm a bit surprised there isn't a mobile option. I do use the site when I'm on my smartphone, and having that as an option (especially for lower bandwidth) would be advantageous.

 

It's something I've been considering but we wanted to get the main bulk of it launched first.

Yeah, I use the mobile version of the forums on my phone. A mobile version of the site, while obviously not the most important issue, would definitely be worth it imo :)

When I first saw this thread, I thought Tip.It had gotten early access to the redesigned RuneScape website. :lol:

I had a quick glance at the beta, and voted for 'improvement' (or whichever the second option was), then I used it. I'd like to upgrade my assement :thumbup:

 

Well done to all involved.

Can't tell how nice it is on my phone :(I gonna have to wait to check how it looks on my laptop later today... but so far looks very nice

Now you have to make the forums match it!@!@!@!

Now you have to make the forums match it!@!@!@!

 

They do, just change the forum skin to the Tip.it theme. :thumbup:

It is on the Tip.It theme, just needs cleaning up :P

Please fix the redundant mouse-hover text box, this is a website design basic. Other than that, good work.

 

When is the final realse?

Please fix the redundant mouse-hover text box, this is a website design basic. Other than that, good work.

 

You have to keep in mind people with disabilities. In this case, people with vision problems.

 

I've written and helped with a few pieces of software for such people. One of which, which used the computer's narrator (And narrator may even do this on it's own now), reads text from tooltip classed windows or those who have trouble reading both because of a mental of visual disability. Whether or not this is the reason they keep them or not, I don't know.

Please fix the redundant mouse-hover text box, this is a website design basic. Other than that, good work.

 

You have to keep in mind people with disabilities. In this case, people with vision problems.

 

I've written and helped with a few pieces of software for such people. One of which, which used the computer's narrator (And narrator may even do this on it's own now), reads text from tooltip classed windows or those who have trouble reading both because of a mental of visual disability. Whether or not this is the reason they keep them or not, I don't know.

 

Both versions of the site validate with the service provided by W3C. IIRC including the alt text is a requirement to validate successfully isn't it?