February 16, 200917 yr That's right, its so cheap fast and easy to train melle, and guess what, it's the best monster killer by far in the long run. Why would anyone become a pure Ranger or Mage is beyond me. Open to discussion, how to get through the game without raising attk and str let me know
February 16, 200917 yr becoming a range/mage tank? def > atk/str imo....and that combo with bolts and ancients is deadly to any1 ur attacking. ~ 3,072nd to 99 Mining on August 30th, 2009 ~~ 112,084th to 99 Magic on April 16th, 2011 ~~ 131,681st to 99 Crafting on March 29, 2019 ~~ 178,385th to 99 Prayer on April 2, 2019 ~~ 234,921st to 99 Defence on May 9, 2019 ~~ 173,480th to 99 Herblore on June 21, 2019 ~~ 155,160th to 99 Smithing on July 16, 2019 ~
February 16, 200917 yr Melle, huh? Isn't that a frosting? Like marzipan, but for those with weak constitutions? If the CORPORAL beast is this hard, imagine how hard a GENERAL or COLONEL beast would be. a corporal is not even an admirable rank in armies that use that ranking system. Yeah, it is a pking minigame, so any arguments anybody makes will probably be biased.The best way this will end :Everybody just says,"I'm not arguing with you anymore, goodbye."The worst way this will end: I don't really know, psychological warfare? Worldwide thermonuclear war? Pie eating contest?
February 16, 200917 yr Number one, it's called Melee. Number two, pure rangers and mages hit higher. I've seen a ranger hit 47 in Bounty Hunter. I've seen mages hit around 20-30 with Ancients fairly easily. Plus, melee takes forever to train. Number three, all of us lazy people are gonna train melee. Why is this even here? Glad to know my homies are looking out for me.
February 16, 200917 yr Author I knew some sparkie mage would speak up and say DOWN with (mellee) . Well this is here to decide who is the better.
February 16, 200917 yr (02:50:14) -[AF]RuneScript- *** [ MELLE ]: does not appear in the high scores list. Clearly not.
February 16, 200917 yr you sir are a fool. all three angles of the combat triangle have their advantages and disadvantages. besides, mage and range are extremely fast to train with enough money to spare.
February 16, 200917 yr they all have there uses, mage has special effects and (against melee armour) is very accurate, range is very accurate,melee has defense and high strength but little accuracy.
February 16, 200917 yr Everything has a reason behind it (yes, including life), and that includes range and magic. Melee, range, and magic all have their pros and cons about them. No use trying to say melee is better than the other two. Have a nice day! Remember, duckies go moo. ^ Blog.
February 16, 200917 yr I'm a pure ranger, I suppose. Why did I train it? I like the idea of having almost themed characters. I never roleplay, but I plan to get my range maxed out, followed by fletching, woodcutting and agility. I guess I just like the concept. Runescape is really the only MMORPG where you can be a "master" of every skill. Melee might be easier to use in certain situations, but I believe in PvP that I generally have the advantage. I'm going to be 99 Range and 70 Def, and under 90 combat without summ. I think that's a pretty powerful character, and it's perfectly balanced, unlike a 99 att 1 def 99 str meleer.
February 16, 200917 yr melee has the ags, dragon claws and the dragon dagger. range has the dark bow magic has ancients. (maybe magic needs an update?)
February 16, 200917 yr Excuse me my named is spelled Melee* and ty yes I do hold quite a bit of power
February 16, 200917 yr melee has the ags, dragon claws and the dragon dagger. range has the dark bow magic has ancients. (maybe magic needs an update?) Dragon bolts are more dangerous than Dark Bow. They hit consistantly high, and your opponant never knows when you will hit a random 50+
February 16, 200917 yr melee has the ags, dragon claws and the dragon dagger. range has the dark bow magic has ancients. (maybe magic needs an update?) Dragon bolts are more dangerous than Dark Bow. They hit consistantly high, and your opponant never knows when you will hit a random 50+ Dark Bow is usually used for its special to kill then switched back to the main weapon if necessary. [hide=Drops]Dragon: Spear x1, Med helm x3, legs x2, pickaxe x1, skirt x3, scimitar x1Barrows: DH helm x1, Verac Brassy x2, Karil Skirt x1, Ahrim Hood x2, Guthan SpearGWD: Arma Helm x1Other: Handcannon x4, Leaf Bladed Sword x3[/hide]
February 16, 200917 yr Runescape is melee based, and mage and range are just "subclasses." Especially on F2P, where you usually need melee's use of the R2H for ko-ability.
February 16, 200917 yr Number one, it's called Melee. Number two, pure rangers and mages hit higher. I've seen a ranger hit 47 in Bounty Hunter. I've seen mages hit around 20-30 with Ancients fairly easily. Plus, melee takes forever to train. Number three, all of us lazy people are gonna train melee. Why is this even here? Range/Mage doesn't hit higher than melee at all. Mage has a max of 32, 30 if we're being realistic. Getting a max hit out of all the ammunitions in Range is very difficult (mainly talking about dragon/onyx bolts there), but I think dark bow hits ~84? One in a million chance of getting max due to two seperate hits aswell. Melee has godswords hitting in 70's, dharoks hitting 110+ PvM, DDS hitting 90+, etc. Anyway, melee isn't as overpowered as people make it out to be. It isn't all about max hits. Range and mage both have extremely high accuracy while melee at times can be all hitting 0's. Range has the combination of accuracy, speed and powerfull hits. Mage has extremely high accuracy, stat nerfs and ancient spell combos. Mage is a bit below the rest, not by as much as people think. The reason why melee is so preffered in boss hunting is because mains tend to favour it more (it is cheaper after all) and you can virtually melee in any armour. Melee, range and mage. With range your stuck in d hides and mage in robes. A Draconic Guide V1.4, Fimer - Multi-Timer Farming Timer V3.Dragon Boots: 39|Abyssal Whips: 16|Dark Bows: 1|
February 16, 200917 yr Erm, I range and Mage. *points at signature* Yep, solo hilt when they were 141m and a magical combat guide. Can melee kill 7 people at once? All of whom are attacking you? Magic can. Range is cheap and extremly effective in both PvP and PvM. I infact no longer own a whip, no use for it. If I don't have a bow/staff/wand, I'm wielding my gold castle wars sword. Melee is useful, but it doesn't blow away any other class. Want proof? PM me, and suit up for combat. So, Lone Star, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.
February 16, 200917 yr Saradomin and Armadyl gw are the most difficult soloable monster, and are both ranged. A level 99def/range/hp pker is ~95 combat and destroys anyone their level. quit
February 16, 200917 yr Erm, I range and Mage. *points at signature* Yep, solo hilt when they were 141m and a magical combat guide. Can melee kill 7 people at once? All of whom are attacking you? Dragon Two hander. If the CORPORAL beast is this hard, imagine how hard a GENERAL or COLONEL beast would be. a corporal is not even an admirable rank in armies that use that ranking system. Yeah, it is a pking minigame, so any arguments anybody makes will probably be biased.The best way this will end :Everybody just says,"I'm not arguing with you anymore, goodbye."The worst way this will end: I don't really know, psychological warfare? Worldwide thermonuclear war? Pie eating contest?
February 16, 200917 yr sorry range if so much better range has the darkbow which can one hit along with onyx and d stone bolts and the obvious fact of being a ranged attack Check it out, huge amount of effort has gone into this massive mod![hide=old sig][/hide]
February 16, 200917 yr While this image is grossly oversized for signature purposes, it does sum my opinion on ranged vs. melee nicely :P My Tip.It Times Articles (10 and counting) || The Varrock Library Author Index projectDo you dare to dream? - Part 19 added. || The Hospital (WIP) - New story!Necromagus looks like a viking ... with glasses.
Create an account or sign in to comment